Pressure on PIP Assessors and Potential Benefit Cuts

Former Personal Independence Payment (PIP) assessors have disclosed that the Department for Work and Pensions (Department for Work and Pension’s (DWP)) operates a target-driven system that pressures staff to reduce points awarded to claimants. Both claimants argue that the pressure contributes to rushed, superficial decisions that often lead to appeals.

iNews

PIP provides up to £800 a month to people with disabilities, with lower-rate awards given to those scoring eight points on daily-activity questions and higher-rate awards to those scoring twelve points or more. Since its introduction over a decade ago, the scheme has faced criticism for not keeping pace with rising diagnoses of anxiety, depression, autism and ADHD. Government forecasts project spending to rise from £32.1 bn this year to £44.7 bn by 2030-31.

iNews

Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden told the Work and Pensions Committee that the Timms-led PIP review could reduce spending on the benefit. He added that “nothing to stop” the review from recommending cuts. Stephen Timms, who leads the review, has said it has not yet examined eligibility changes based on diagnosis. The Labour government previously abandoned a plan to tighten PIP eligibility after a rebellion by Labour MPs.

iNews

Former assessors argue that the focus on productivity targets “discriminates” against claimants with mental-health or neurodivergent conditions. Merrell called Reform UK’s proposal to scrap PIP for “mild” cases “disgusting” and “bonkers,” warning that “most people don’t deserve support” is an unrealistic stance. Reform UK and the Conservatives have advocated a dramatic cut-back, proposing to limit PIP to the most severe cases and to reassess all “mild” claims.

iNews

• “If you get better decisions first time, then you don’t need to go through appeals and tribunals,” — James Merrell — James Merrell, former PIP assessor.

iNews