Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

The Long History of Women’s Laughter as a Social Threat

By Drooid · · How we work

Historical Suppression of Women’s Laughter

Women’s laughter has been treated as a sign of moral and social danger for centuries. Medieval Church teachings linked spontaneous joy to a loss of spiritual discipline, describing laughter as a public display of earthly pleasure that could threaten moral purity. Early Western thinkers, influenced by Platonic ideas, framed female laughter as a challenge to hierarchical order.

Cultural Roots and Early Narratives

The perception persisted into the 19th century. An 1893 story describes Bertha Pruett in Philadelphia laughing so violently after a witty remark that she collapsed, bled from her nose and mouth, and died before help arrived. Similar anecdotes suggested women could die simply for laughing at jokes about mothers-in-law, reinforcing fear of laughter in private homes and public spaces.

Modern Evidence of Gendered Humor Evaluation

A 2019 study *Gender and the Evaluation of Humor at Work* by Jonathan B. Evans et al. found that men who make others laugh tend to gain status while women experience the opposite effect. Contemporary political figures such as Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris have faced repeated scrutiny of their laughter, a pattern rarely applied to male counterparts. These findings indicate that historic suspicion of women’s laughter continues to shape gender dynamics in modern institutions.

Media’s Role in Shifting Perceptions

The rise of mass media in the 20th century helped erode the stigma. Early cinema offered visual examples of women laughing without fatal consequence, providing a symbolic model for audiences. Henri Bergson’s 1900 work *Laughter* described the act as a break in social rigidity, suggesting laughter exposes artificial norms. Television programs—*I Love Lucy*, Mexico’s *El Chavo del Ocho*, and Britain’s *Keeping Up Appearances*—along with daytime talk shows featuring light-hearted banter, gave women repeated exposure to “easy laughter.”

Personal Accounts of Transformation

The author recounts a grandmother who never laughed, a pattern echoed by friends from Saudi Arabia, Japan, and Spain. A Spanish acquaintance noted her grandmother only began to laugh after developing dementia, describing the change as a release from rigidity. Regularly watching talk-show segments that mixed recipes, domestic advice, and silliness eventually led the author’s grandmother to embrace laughter.

Why It Matters Today

The lingering bias against women’s laughter affects professional advancement, political perception, and everyday social interaction. When women’s humor is devalued, it reinforces gender hierarchies and limits expressive freedom that contributes to mental health and social cohesion. Understanding the historical roots of this bias highlights the importance of cultural exposure that normalizes women’s laughter across media and public life.

Gaps and Ongoing Questions

While historical anecdotes and recent studies document the persistence of gendered humor judgments, systematic data on the prevalence of laughter-related discrimination in non-Western cultures remain limited. Further research could explore how contemporary digital platforms influence the acceptance of women’s laughter worldwide.